Hot Off The Press

 

See it here ... see if first ... see it HOT OFF THE PRESS

 

 

Quarry debate heats up

The application by the Barro Group to expand the quarry (called Burrum Quarry) on the Beerburrum – Woodford Road at Beerburrum has come under detailed questioning from the local community, Sunshine Coast Council and the Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Local Government.
Both the Council and the State Department made requests for greater detailed information on issues they felt needed a more thorough explanation than provided in the material change of use application.

Council raised concerns on staging, visual amenity, the need for the quarry, the haulage route, traffic and engineering. The Department sought clarification on road pavement impacts, groundwater impacts, noise levels, stormwater and assessable vegetation.
The Barro Group has subsequently provided a raft of documentation answering the issues raised – all of which are publicly available through Councils development assessment portal www.pdonline.sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au and search for MCU16/0275).
More recently, a community group has formed with the aim of stopping the quarry.
The Beerburrum Action Group have coopted the help of Steve Dickson, Member for Buderim and the Queensland leader of the One Nation party and have started a petition to take the fight to Parliament.
The online parliamentary petition (a link to which can be found on the group’s facebook page) raises eight specific reasons why they oppose the application.
The Barro Group were approached by GC&M News and asked to respond to the community unease.
Barro Group General Manager, Ian Ridoutt said that they welcome the opportunity to provide information to the greater community.
“The Barro Group is open to discussion and debate about all matters related to the project,” he said.
In a written response to GC&M News, Mr Ridoutt answered each of the eight points from the petition.

 

Petition issue 1
Residential homes on Cobb & Co Crescent, Carriage Crescent, Eaton Road and Beerburrum-Woodford Road are only 1.2km from the extension of the proposed quarry site which is only gazetted as a gravel pit.
Barro response
The statement that the quarry site is only gazetted as a gravel pit is untrue.
The Burrum quarry resource is identified as an extractive resource in the Sunshine Coast Regional Planning Scheme and has an extractive resource overly code. One of the purposes of the overlay code is to “protect extractive resource areas and transport routes”.
The Burrum quarry resource is also identified as a Key Resource Area (KRA) in the State Planning Policy. KRA’s are “identified as containing important extractive resources of state or regional significance which the
state considers worthy of protection for future use”.
There are 12 residential houses on the west side of Cobb & Co Crescent and 1 rural house on the north side of Eaton Road that will be approximately 1.7km away from where the quarrying will recommence. Over the
next 10 to 20 years quarrying will move progressively eastwards but will never become closer than 1.2kms away from these houses.


Petition issue 2
Noise impact from blasting, crushing machinery with 150 truck movements daily through Beerburrum Township and Glasshouse District affecting schools, retirement villages, tourism, agri-business and existing infrastructure.
Barro response
MWA Environmental consultants assessed the potential noise impacts from quarrying activities which included conducting existing background noise monitoring and preparing a detailed noise generation model. The conclusion of the assessment was that the proposed quarrying activities can comply with the regulatory noise limits at the closest house with the implementation of noise control measures.
Those control measure have been adopted into the Site Management Plan and it is expected that SCRC would condition any approval such that it is mandatory for Barro Group to comply with the Site Management Plan.
It is important to understand that much of the Beerburrum township is already subject to existing high noise overlay areas. The Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme Beerburrum Local Plan Area shows that properties covered by the solid grey shading “Major Road Corridor and Buffer” will be subject to high road noise levels.


The properties covered by the green hatched shading “Railway Corridor and Buffer” are also subject to high noise levels related to the train line, especially from the diesel powered locomotives, and it was a SCRC condition of approval for many of the properties in the Acacia Grove housing precinct that the when the land was sold, potential buyers must be provided with an acoustic report detailing the extent of the railway noise and that covenants must be registered against the titles for road traffic noise affected lots.
The section of Beerburrum Road through the town is identified in the Sunshine Coast Regional Council (SCRC) planning scheme and in particular in the Beerburrum Local Plan Area. The Local Plan clearly recognises this section of road as being a “Major Road Corridor and Buffer” and its intended use is for a high volume of cars and trucks.
To understand the impact of the quarry trucks on Beerburrum Road through the town it is helpful that the SCRC requested that Barro Group engage a traffic survey and engineering company to conduct physical counts of the current vehicle quantities which has allowed an analysis to be undertaken to determine what the real impact of the quarry trucks would be.
Current traffic volumes on Beerburrum Rd through the township without the quarry are on average 4838 vehicles per day including 176 trucks.
With the addition of the quarry trucks the results are best demonstrated in the pie charts below and it is very clear that the overall impact of the quarry trucks will be very low.


 
There is clear intent in the SCRC planning scheme and the State’s designations that Beerburrum Road has an intended use for high traffic volumes and heavy vehicles and the data shown in the pie charts confirms that the heavy vehicles associated with the quarry extension will have minimal impact to the on the Beerburrum township.

Petition issue 3
Beerburrum Mountain is part of the heritage listed Glasshouse Mountains area, an important link to our nation's history as part of the Mathew Flinders Heritage Trial, and must be protected from destruction.
Barro response
The inference that Burrum Quarry in some way will be responsible for the destruction of Mt Beerburrum is untrue.
There should be no confusion that the Burrum Quarry site is in the middle of a commercial pine plantation and is not within the Burrum Mountain State Forrest which is some distance away.
 

Petition issue 4
Road infrastructure, including a small railway bridge, is suffering greatly and is the only northern access to Beerburrum for vehicles, pedestrians and emergency vehicles.
Barro response
This statement is untrue.
The owner of the bridge, the Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) have advised:

 
Petition issue 5
No benefit to the Beerburrum Community regarding jobs as workers are on contract with Barro Group P/L.
Barro response
This statement is untrue.
Barro Group do not have any contract arrangements relating to employment at Beerburrum, we don’t have an operating business there currently. We have had many calls from people seeking employment but we have no ability to provide new employment opportunities unless the Burrum Quarry Extension is approved.
If Burrum Quarry Extension is approved, local people and local suppliers will be given preference.
 

Petition issue 6
HQ Plantations Pty Ltd currently lease the surrounding pine forest. They've advised they will harvest trees which will remove the current sound barrier between the houses and the proposed quarry extension.
Barro response
Barro Group advised the participants at the public meeting on 20 July that HQ Plantations had provided information that the planned harvest time for the pine plantation surrounding the quarry was 2025.
The meeting was also advised that irrespective of this that a stand of 20m high remnant vegetation barrier would remain almost completely surrounding the quarry.
A power point presentation was shown to the attendees demonstrating where the 20m high stand of remnant vegetation is and the same information was also contained in the visual amenity report that was provided as part of the application documents supplied to SCRC.
 

Petition issue 7
Beerburrum State School would face hazard and safety issues from 150 truck movements daily.
Barro response
Beerburrum State School will face no hazard and safety issues from 150 truck movement daily however it is the safe movement of children arriving and departing from the school that is of interest to Barro Group.
Beerburrum State School is a small school with about 160 students which is accessed from Beerburrum Rd at the township.
Currently without the quarry operating, on average a total of 4838 vehicles, including 176 trucks, travel past the school each day along Beerburrum Rd through the township. It is expected that if the quarry is
approved, on average, an additional 7 quarry trucks travelling in both directions will pass the school in the hour that children will be arriving and in the hour that children will be departing the school.
Whilst the additional quarry trucks will only increase the current traffic by about 3% Barro Group engaged traffic engineers to study the current infrastructure that is in place around the school to assist with providing a safe environment for the children when arriving and departing from the school.
The report has been provided as part of the documents supplied to SCRC and is available for viewing by any interested party.
The key finding of the report are that all the required infrastructure is already in place, which is not surprising given the already high traffic volumes passing the school.

  • Off street one way children drop of area
  • Off street long term day car parking
  • Diamond school crossing ahead warning signs both ways
  • Solar powered illuminated flashing school zone signs operating from 7am to 9am and 2pm to 4pm limiting the speed to 40km/hr
  • Well identified and marked school crossing zone including flags that is controlled by an authorised crossing Supervisor
    Long sight distances in both directions enabling plenty of visual warning time for slowing and stopping

The bus bay is indented from the main carriage way
A recent inquiry was been made in regard to truck braking time and Barro Group commissioned a traffic engineer to provide information on this matter.
The report has been supplied to SCRC and concludes:
“The available sight distances and therefore the associated truck stopping distances are more than sufficient”
As an additional management initiative, Barro Group intend to implement a driver’s code of conduct which has been provided as part of the application documents supplied to SCRC.


Petition issue 8
The proposed quarry site is located within traditional lands of the Jinibara and Gubbi Gubbi people. There has been no consultation with these groups.
Barro response
This statement is untrue.
The quarry is located on Part Lot 589 on FTY 1876. This land is recognised on the Register of Native Title Claims QUD280/2013 as land associated with the Kabi Kabi First Nation (pronounced as Gubbi Gubbi). Amongst the 7 named applicants for this claim is Bianca Beetson. Barro Group contacted Kabi Kabi First Nation and their contact people Bianca Beetson and Tony Dalton nominated cultural heritage services company Archaeo to act as their technical advisors including accompanying Kabi Kabi representatives on a site survey. A Cultural Heritage Assessment report was prepared and submitted to SCRC by Barro Group as part of the Development Application documents.
Whilst is well acknowledged that the Jinibara People have a Native Title Determination QUD6128/1998 which covers a large area of land in the Sunshine Coast region, the Determination does not cover the quarry location Part Lot 589 on FTY 1876.


(click here for a pdf version of this document) 

 
© 2017 Glasshouse Country News   |   Terms & Conditions   |   Privacy Policy   |   Website by Static Wave